<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:tir="http://theinspirationroom.com/namespace/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAC Accident Reconstruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2007/transport-accident-commission-reconstruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2007/transport-accident-commission-reconstruction/</link>
	<description>Advertising creativity from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadthevideo</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2007/transport-accident-commission-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator>deadthevideo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/2007/transport-accident-commission-reconstruction#comment-5539</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the TAC do this sort of ad before?  The answer would be yes.  In the late 90s they ran a campaign aimed at highlighting safe braking distances.  That ad used a road accident as an example, playing it twice.  The second time was played in intentional slow motion as a doctor gave a graphic and detailed explanation of what can happen to the human body if struck by a speeding vehicle who doesn&#039;t brake in time.  It then showed an example of what can happen if a car does brake in time.  This new advert has distinct shades of that one.  It may be effective, but I feel it is a rehash of an old idea, showing a distinct lack of creativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the TAC do this sort of ad before?  The answer would be yes.  In the late 90s they ran a campaign aimed at highlighting safe braking distances.  That ad used a road accident as an example, playing it twice.  The second time was played in intentional slow motion as a doctor gave a graphic and detailed explanation of what can happen to the human body if struck by a speeding vehicle who doesn&#8217;t brake in time.  It then showed an example of what can happen if a car does brake in time.  This new advert has distinct shades of that one.  It may be effective, but I feel it is a rehash of an old idea, showing a distinct lack of creativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

