Comments on: Breast Cancer Breakthrough With Ode to Boobs

By: Jeff

Jeff — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:07:49 +0000

Lovely Knockers!!

By: 123

123 — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:26:30 +0000

this is not pr0n. low res (vid cap), no cr@ppy makeup, no digital airbrush, etc.
but yes, she is a “sex symbol”. clothed or not.
of course the *baby* isn’t a sex symbol, cuz other babies aren’t looking around like “that”.
also noticing that this cap also doesn’t portray bratfeeding (oops, “breastfeeding”), lactation, or anything like that. presumably the source vid does.
funny thing about google. this is a 2006 post, yet the comments appear to begin ~2.5 years later (or perhaps old comments were swept out?)

By: hubert

hubert — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:30:20 +0000

After reading all those posts, I really don’t know what to say. Sorry, this wan’t called for!

You just need to see things in the light that it is portrayed and not with hidden meanings!

Oooops, I opened my mouth again. Sorry

By: kroSoft

kroSoft — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:15:37 +0000

nIcE bOoS xD

By: tron

tron — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:51:17 +0000

hurray titties

By: claudie

claudie — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:02:05 +0000

I don’t think it was necessary for this woman to be naked. It would have been more appropriate to have her covered with something.

By: Pitman

Pitman — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:30:46 +0000

She should be wearing some clothes. This isn’t really portraying the right image is it?

By: matt

matt — Fri, 01 May 2009 11:42:31 +0000

lol im 12

By: Jamal Panhwar

Jamal Panhwar — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:07:51 +0000

Mother and baby relation can very well be presented with mum wearing clothes. The mother is not a sex symbol and feeding milk is also not supposed to be shown this way.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:54:48 +0000

mother and baby relation. + a wonderful natural picture