<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford SportKa Deals With Cat and Pigeon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/</link>
	<description>Advertising creativity from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:58:43 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sketchley</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-155850</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sketchley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-155850</guid>
		<description>Clever, but why would an ad agency - let alone a car company - label its product as &quot;evil&quot;.
Marketing people are so dumb so often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever, but why would an ad agency &#8211; let alone a car company &#8211; label its product as &#8220;evil&#8221;.<br />
Marketing people are so dumb so often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-69681</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-69681</guid>
		<description>I thought they were shockingly funny... Surely No one wants to harm an animal. But how many of You Animal Rights Whiners whine about things that &quot;Appear&quot; in likeness? 

Do you have any idea how many frogs you squash on the roads after it rains? What About Worms? have you Recorded how many monrach Butterflies YOU kill On your average Commute on a rural route?

What About Catepillars?

Yeah It seems to me you only bitch when it&#039;s &quot;in your face&quot; or if it&#039;s Fuzzy and Cute....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they were shockingly funny&#8230; Surely No one wants to harm an animal. But how many of You Animal Rights Whiners whine about things that &#8220;Appear&#8221; in likeness? </p>
<p>Do you have any idea how many frogs you squash on the roads after it rains? What About Worms? have you Recorded how many monrach Butterflies YOU kill On your average Commute on a rural route?</p>
<p>What About Catepillars?</p>
<p>Yeah It seems to me you only bitch when it&#8217;s &#8220;in your face&#8221; or if it&#8217;s Fuzzy and Cute&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadthevideo</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>deadthevideo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-893</guid>
		<description>I actually like both of these ads.  The admakers combined real animals in the ads with fake ones.  I would say that they used trickery to get the animals to do what was required of them to get the right effect.  The cat ad did get some press coverage with articles about the advert appearing in national newspapers.  In a country (UK) where advertising is supposed to be the best but is governed by authoritarian guidelines the average ad break would serve to argue against that particular belief, it is good to see that Ogilvy and Mather were prepared to go against those rules.  Of course, ads like these would get their moaners, people who believe our no-particularly-great ad breaks should stay that way, but that would be expected, they even complained about a toilet roll ad featuring naked backsides.  Some people may not like it, look at the fuss generated by a Wrigley&#039;s ad showing a man throwing up a dog, but we should have more daring ads on air, even if it is after the UK watershed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like both of these ads.  The admakers combined real animals in the ads with fake ones.  I would say that they used trickery to get the animals to do what was required of them to get the right effect.  The cat ad did get some press coverage with articles about the advert appearing in national newspapers.  In a country (UK) where advertising is supposed to be the best but is governed by authoritarian guidelines the average ad break would serve to argue against that particular belief, it is good to see that Ogilvy and Mather were prepared to go against those rules.  Of course, ads like these would get their moaners, people who believe our no-particularly-great ad breaks should stay that way, but that would be expected, they even complained about a toilet roll ad featuring naked backsides.  Some people may not like it, look at the fuss generated by a Wrigley&#8217;s ad showing a man throwing up a dog, but we should have more daring ads on air, even if it is after the UK watershed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Evil Ford Ka Twin &#171; I saw it in an Ad&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evil Ford Ka Twin &#171; I saw it in an Ad&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-891</guid>
		<description>[...] To read more about the ads click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To read more about the ads click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-890</guid>
		<description>The cat, and the pidgeon, are both hilarious.  I wish they could show them on TV.  I would like to see more of the same.  It extracts a certain levity within our humerous nature, and plays upon the unexpected emotions of being part of something different.

Hail evil-twins uk.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cat, and the pidgeon, are both hilarious.  I wish they could show them on TV.  I would like to see more of the same.  It extracts a certain levity within our humerous nature, and plays upon the unexpected emotions of being part of something different.</p>
<p>Hail evil-twins uk&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayakjim</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>kayakjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-889</guid>
		<description>bob; how&#039;s your testing coming along???

The pigeon one was funny, though the cat I literally fell out of my chair laughing so hard!!  Lighten up, people!!
No wonder the world is so bloody stressed out!  I hope the PETA folks puke on their bile-filed tirades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bob; how&#8217;s your testing coming along???</p>
<p>The pigeon one was funny, though the cat I literally fell out of my chair laughing so hard!!  Lighten up, people!!<br />
No wonder the world is so bloody stressed out!  I hope the PETA folks puke on their bile-filed tirades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-888</guid>
		<description>I love these two adverts, there is absolutly nothing wrong with them.
The pidgon one was funny, the Cat one was unexpected, but all the more funny, and the Ford SportKa was a hard F****r!
Wish they wern&#039;t banned, though!
(It&#039;s always the best ad&#039;s on T.V that get banned!)
Oh, how I yearn for more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these two adverts, there is absolutly nothing wrong with them.<br />
The pidgon one was funny, the Cat one was unexpected, but all the more funny, and the Ford SportKa was a hard F****r!<br />
Wish they wern&#8217;t banned, though!<br />
(It&#8217;s always the best ad&#8217;s on T.V that get banned!)<br />
Oh, how I yearn for more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-887</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to all preceding comments: Firstly, I am the proud owner of two cats and happen to know that even though they are lazy they are quick enough to get their heads out of that situation anytime.
Second, as a safety procedure, electric sunroofs and windows are never ever powerful enough to do something like that unless the car company wants to risk a serious lawsuit. I found both ads totally piss-funny and the cat one more so, and I also was smart enough to realise as soon as I saw it happen that IT ISN&#039;T REAL...... To the ad people: MORE PLEASE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to all preceding comments: Firstly, I am the proud owner of two cats and happen to know that even though they are lazy they are quick enough to get their heads out of that situation anytime.<br />
Second, as a safety procedure, electric sunroofs and windows are never ever powerful enough to do something like that unless the car company wants to risk a serious lawsuit. I found both ads totally piss-funny and the cat one more so, and I also was smart enough to realise as soon as I saw it happen that IT ISN&#8217;T REAL&#8230;&#8230; To the ad people: MORE PLEASE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julius</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-886</guid>
		<description>For people who don&#039;t like having cat footprints and sometimes scratches on their cars and trucks, the cat video is hilarious.
Both ads are great and since no animals were harmed, well I guess no harm done. If you don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t watch it.
When you watch a Hollywood movie in which there is a murder, do you call the police to report it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For people who don&#8217;t like having cat footprints and sometimes scratches on their cars and trucks, the cat video is hilarious.<br />
Both ads are great and since no animals were harmed, well I guess no harm done. If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t watch it.<br />
When you watch a Hollywood movie in which there is a murder, do you call the police to report it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/ford-sportka/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncans.tv/?p=147#comment-885</guid>
		<description>To those morally outraged-
Please get a sense of humor. Not only are these advertisements funny for what seems to be the majority of people (it&#039;s slapstick comedy), the cat one wasn&#039;t broadcast on television anyways. Besides, if you don&#039;t like it, why not just ignore it? You don&#039;t have much of a right to castrate the media that I enjoy, especially when it&#039;s relatively harmless compared to the majority of public broadcasting. By your logic, I ought to start crusading against gay porn because I, a straight male, don&#039;t like the idea of anyone on the planet watching two men suck each other&#039;s cocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those morally outraged-<br />
Please get a sense of humor. Not only are these advertisements funny for what seems to be the majority of people (it&#8217;s slapstick comedy), the cat one wasn&#8217;t broadcast on television anyways. Besides, if you don&#8217;t like it, why not just ignore it? You don&#8217;t have much of a right to castrate the media that I enjoy, especially when it&#8217;s relatively harmless compared to the majority of public broadcasting. By your logic, I ought to start crusading against gay porn because I, a straight male, don&#8217;t like the idea of anyone on the planet watching two men suck each other&#8217;s cocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
